A few weeks ago I wrote about changes the National Hurricane Center is making to the Saffir-Simpson Scale. Starting this year, the Scale will no longer include references to storm surge.
You shared your comments here on the Houston Weather Blog and, as promised, I emailed them to Bill Read, Director of the National Hurricane Center (shown to the right.) Bill and I swapped emails back and forth several times this past week and he gave me permission to share his comments with you.
First of all, Bill appreciates a “good healthy dialog" which benefits all of us. He wrote, "The tables as shown in your blog and carried on NOAA/NHC web sites and preparedness pamphlets have been a bad addition since day one. You know my ideal world view would be to not have a scale."
Rather than getting rid of the scale or changing it, I suggested NHC should separate the wind and surge levels, but ultimately rank the storm based on whichever poses the greatest threat. During Hurricane Ike, for example, NHC was expecting a 15-20' surge. Using my method, statements would have read, "Hurricane Ike is a dangerous category four hurricane based on storm surge."
Bill explained that very few people know the surge values assigned to the different categories. However, I responded, most people do know a category 3 storm is a major hurricane, 4 is bigger, and 5 is the worst.
Let me be clear: NHC will not be withholding storm surge information from the public. (Based on a few comments to my original blog post, I'm afraid some people misunderstood.) Instead of a storm surge category rank which I propose, NHC meteorologists will be providing specific water levels for locations along the coast, like that shown to the left. Storm surge probabilities will also be issued for coastal communities. The information is complicated and requires people living in surge zones to spend a lot of time deciphering their personal risk which is why, in addition to that mountain of information, we should also offer a simple category that (1) ranks the intensity of the storm and (2) emphasizes the greatest threat.
"Social Science studies consistently say people need specific information (how strong the winds, how much rain, how deep flooding) to elicit the best response." Bill explained.
I'm all for giving people as much information as possible, that's why I show things on-air like the forecast computer models. But in reality, the public is making decisions based on the category ranking. Many folks in Bolivar waited because Ike was "only a category 2 hurricane."
In conclusion Bill wrote, "The message scientists have given me loud and clear is that (a) Saffir Simpson scale, which was developed solely on the basis of maximum wind, cannot be used as an index for surge, and (b) the range of possibilities based on maximum wind, size of wind field, and bathymetry preclude any meaningful universally applicable range of values. A scale will only work if the information is correct and universally applicable.”
Even though NHC says the revised "Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale" is an experiment, the changes are most likely permanent. The category of a hurricane has always and will always be based only on the wind speed. It gives no indication of how bad the storm surge will be at landfall.
Your Comments